The Free, Prior and Informed Consent in the face of the Free Self-Determination, Autonomy, and Territoriality

Authors

  • José Israel Herrera Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Campeche. San Francisco de Campeche, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/prcs.v0i10.352

Keywords:

Free Prior and Informed Consultation, Free Self-Determination, Autonomy, Territoriality

Abstract

The Free, Prior and Informed Consultation (FPIC) has since the 1980s become an instrument for the protection of rights that allows resistance to asymmetrical power situations. However, this FPIC has been introduced into various legal systems, public policies or management tools as a strategy that benefits indigenous peoples per se, but there has been little to generate about the discussion of its origins, strategies and founding elements. Nevertheless, so little has been said about their origins, their strategies and their basic elements. Hence this article generates a theoretical exercise where the prior, free and informed prior, free and informed consultation is reflected on the founding philosophical and theoretical elements in order to deepen and identify these elements that contribute to the development of this tool especially in its relationship with free self-determination, autonomy and territoriality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Israel Herrera, Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Campeche. San Francisco de Campeche, México

Profesor Investigador de Tiempo Completo del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, México. Miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores Nivel 1. Líneas de investigación: pluralismo jurídico, derechos humanos, minorías, derechos indígenas, antropología jurídica y DESCs.

Published

2020-12-29

How to Cite

Herrera, J. I. (2020). The Free, Prior and Informed Consent in the face of the Free Self-Determination, Autonomy, and Territoriality. Perspectivas Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 5(10), 228–253. https://doi.org/10.35305/prcs.v0i10.352